Hello Dmitry,
On 18 Sep 26 21:07, you wrote to me:
FTS-4009:
---
Program Name
------------
This field is a mandatory string field of up to ten (10) characters
naming the product inserting the Via line.
Ah, there you got me! Since I am no longer active in the FTSC many of the details have evaporated from my active memory. This is one of those details.
Sad, but can't fit the full name there.
Not according to FTS-4009... ...
The examples in FTS-4009 have "Gleipner/Java" as a valid program name,
but it's against the rules of FTS-4009 itself.
Indeed. But there is not just that. "Gleipner/Java" is not (any more?) in active use. Fmail is in use and in active development. Fmail also violates the ten character limit:
=== quote===
@Via 2:280/464 @20260918.092144.282.UTC FMail-lnx64(Pack) 2.3.4.1-B20260520
@Via 2:280/5003.0 @20260918.092402.UTC FIDOGATE/ftntoss 4.4.14
@Via 2:280/2060 @20260918.092601.UTC hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2020-04-15
=== end quote ===
As you can see, Fmail is not the only one. Same for FIDOGATE. My guess is that if you analyse the via lines in your PING tests, you will find many more examples. It does not seem to harm anyone. So we can ask if the FTS-4009 ten character limit on the program name is still "current practise".
"Current practise" is not static. It evolves...
In this particular case it is up to you. Strictly follow 23 year old FTS-4009 or follow the pioneers that ignore the ten character limit and set new "currect practise". ...
Cheers, Michiel
--- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 2.0.0-b20260917
* Origin: Nieuw Schoord (2:280/5555)